PART1
Hello. I am not an astrologer and not very religious.
Astrology itself is a discipline that can be abused and presented without merit full credential of sincerity. Though this may be true, that has nothing to do with it's the factual understandings in relation to its corresponding relationship to other disciplines of fact and evidence
Astrology alone, is a bare naked lady looking to entice the desires of a bare naked man. In order to really comprehend the factual disciplines regarding astrology, I might mention that it would be necessary to understand a smattering of physics, sympathetic harmonics, ancient mathematics, sacred geometry, and more importantly, astronomy. I suggest to you, that astrology is much later on down the list, and there is a list.
I say this because forecast or projective determinations can be accurately derived and calculated if the right confluence of information's are put in effect, as regard their sympathetic relationships to each other.
Without the other sciences behind it, astrology would tend to corrupt the confidence of a reality that many individuals might look for. That does not need to be the case. I might mention that there are some fundamentals necessary to be aware of to get the better grip on this matter. You better sit down for this.
First, there's no such thing as time. There is only an agreed upon condition of period episodes of event occurrence. Astrology is predicated on the understanding of the dynamic movements of celestial bodies and their aspects. This statement alone should suggest that it is not astrology to be first studied, but the aspects of astronomy. Astrology incurs the human psychology to behave as an impact or an interruption, which in this particular conversation, has nothing to do with the prescribed movements of celestial embodiments.
Next, there should be an awareness of the relevant perceptions that have been, and are, consistent with legacy and modern day understandings of the condition of time in the consequential cycles of any given event occurrence. In simpler terms, this means you should understand what a cycle is, why it is, and how you are involved in your own personal terms of evolution within this condition.
You should know that cycles have to do with the condition of duration, which speaks to us in terms of the manifestations of substance and material from beyond the absolute of potential.
You should be familiar with the 'Nineveh' constant of 295 ,955,200,000, because it defines all the orbital periods of the planets in our solar system. This means their cycles can be determined relative to their rate of travel and speed of acceleration. If you're astrologer even hints that he knows these type things in a casual manner, this might be a person that you do want to talk to. Because this would suggest that the astrologer would be conscious of the sacred geometries, relative aspect angles, planetary rates of acceleration and correspondent velocities, coordinate positioning within given cycles, and probably much more. Otherwise, you might end up wanting your money back?
END PART1
Tom Garris